NI Home
Cart Cart | Help
Hello Events Academic NI Developer Zone Support Solutions Products & Services Contact NI MyNI
You are here: 
NI Home > NI Developer Zone > NI Discussion Forums


Announcements
The NI Idea Exchange is a product feedback forum where NI R&D and users work together to submit ideas, collaborate on their development, and vote for the ones they like best. View all of the NI Idea Exchanges to post an idea or add your opinion on an existing one today!
Jeff·Þ·Bohrer

Negate input on boolean functions

Status: New
by Proven Zealot on ‎03-04-2010 02:56 PM
I would like to see an invert node option for all the boolean operators  (didn't we used to have this ?) For consistancy with the rest of the boolean operators the select primitave should have this for its select input too (And here I would argue that the tertiary operator is a boolean operator but, I know its in the comparision palette so please don't move it) .   I learned my logic a long long time ago and frequently use And not, Or not and if-then.  the extra not nodes clutter up my BD unless  I use the multiple boolean and frankly the symbol on that function is small enough that I can miss-read the mode.
Comments
by Knight of NI on ‎03-04-2010 03:13 PM
What do you mean by the "tertiary operator"?  The compound arithmetic node? It can be set for OR or AND.  Set for one or more inputs, and all the inputs and the outputs can be individually selected for inverting.  I think that function is the best if you need any kind of logic that the traditional functions OR, AND, NOR, NAND, XOR, NXOR can't handle.
by Active Participant elset191 on ‎03-04-2010 03:30 PM
Tertiary is the C name for Select
by Proven Zealot on ‎03-04-2010 03:30 PM

tert.png

Called the tertiary operator in Text languages-  It sticks on me

by Active Participant X. on ‎10-19-2010 01:08 PM

A related suggestion (to dump a lot of the logical operators): here

by Trusted Enthusiast on ‎06-20-2012 11:55 AM

I was just about to suggest this and found it doing a search. Kudos!

by Active Participant elset191 on ‎06-20-2012 12:28 PM

Something's been bothering me for the past two years since I first saw this idea.  It's called ternary operator, not tertiary.

Latest LabVIEW Idea Exchange Blog Posts
About LabVIEW Idea Exchange

Have a LabVIEW Idea?

  1. Browse by label or search in the LabVIEW Idea Exchange to see if your idea has previously been submitted. If your idea exists be sure to vote for the idea by giving it kudos to indicate your approval!
  2. If your idea has not been submitted click Post New Idea to submit a product idea to the LabVIEW Idea Exchange. Be sure to submit a separate post for each idea.
  3. Watch as the community gives your idea kudos and adds their input.
  4. As NI R&D considers the idea, they will change the idea status.
  5. Give kudos to other ideas that you would like to see in a future version of LabVIEW!
Idea Statuses
Top Kudoed Authors
User Kudos Count
126
86
76
66
64
By using this web site, you accept the Terms of Use for this web site. Please read these Terms of Use carefully before using any part of this site. Please go here for information on ni.com's copyright infringement policy.
My Profile | Privacy | Legal | Contact NI © 2011 National Instruments Corporation. All rights reserved.    |    E-Mail this Page E-Mail this Page