キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

Complex exponential

解決済み
解決策を見る

Hello guys,

 

I want to multiply a signal by a complex exponential just as in the second picture. Is it correct the way I did it ? See the first picture below

The idea is to multiply a signal by a two ray channel (second pic). Is it correct to multiply a complex signal with the Doppler shift this way ?

 

Best regards,

Ali Sabra

 

すべてをダウンロード
0 件の賞賛
メッセージ1/15
5,767件の閲覧回数

@AliSabra wrote:

Hello guys,

 

I want to multiply a signal by a complex exponential just as in the second picture. Is it correct the way I did it ? See the first picture below

The idea is to multiply a signal by a two ray channel (second pic). Is it correct to multiply a complex signal with the Doppler shift this way ?

 

Best regards,

Ali Sabra

 


It seems OK to me.

 

You can test by putting it in a for loop, or applying the formula to a ramp. That should give an output of a sin in Im and a cos in Re (or vice versa).

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ2/15
5,752件の閲覧回数

Thanks for your help.

Am I testing it correctly ?

Because there is no difference between the original signal and the Doppler shifted one.

Maybe because I am using a waveform generator instead of a simulated signal ? I dont see the I and Q 

 

すべてをダウンロード
0 件の賞賛
メッセージ3/15
5,738件の閲覧回数

You're multiplying a single value (scalar) with a signal.

 

You should be multiplying a signal (the original) with the generated signal (a ramp put through the formula).

 

Both are functions or time, you now only have one function as time.

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ4/15
5,732件の閲覧回数

@AliSabra wrote:

I dont see the I and Q 


To see the I and Q, you'd need to split the signal up into the Im and Re of the result...

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ5/15
5,730件の閲覧回数

Can you send me a screenshot plz ? 

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ6/15
5,728件の閲覧回数
解決策
受理者 AliSabra

Sure, but it's LV CG:

Doppler.PNGDoppler.PNG

 

It's clear that multiplying the signals, adds the frequencies.

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ7/15
5,704件の閲覧回数

Look what is happening :S

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ8/15
5,679件の閲覧回数

Maybe the configuration isn't correct ?

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ9/15
5,673件の閲覧回数

@AliSabra wrote:

Maybe the configuration isn't correct ?


I'm not into NXG enough to adive on that...

 

Apparently, those signals do work with complex numbers, but the ramp signal seems to be different than the sine?

0 件の賞賛
メッセージ10/15
5,663件の閲覧回数