BreakPoint
Rube Goldberg Code
@altenbach wrote:
@Yamaeda wrote:
If you add a U8 to a I32, to you explicitly convert the U8 first? 😉 I mean, the code is more correct, but the extra blocks makes it a little harder to read, since i always think "why are they doing this explicit conversion?".In addition, an explicit conversion is sometimes more expensive. (Example, but you would think the compiler should create identical code. I have not tested in recent version)
Debug still turned on? My impression was that the explicit conversion was making more places that could be probed, etc. With debugging off, I would expect identical code.
@crossrulz wrote:
With debugging off, I would expect identical code.
In principle, there is still an extra memory allocation of the lower DBL array while the multiplication might know how to multiply an integer with a DBL directly. No time for extensive tests at the moment ....
@altenbach wrote:
@Yamaeda wrote:
If you add a U8 to a I32, to you explicitly convert the U8 first? 😉 I mean, the code is more correct, but the extra blocks makes it a little harder to read, since i always think "why are they doing this explicit conversion?".In addition, an explicit conversion is sometimes more expensive. (Example, but you would think the compiler should create identical code. I have not tested in recent version)
Yeah i remember that little nugget. I assume it allocates a new array or something. Maybe Bool to number should have configurable output like the Multiply has?
@altenbach wrote:
@Yamaeda wrote:
Maybe Bool to number should have configurable output like the Multiply has?exactly 😄
It was only suggested in 2009, give'em some time! 😉
I have no intention debugging this mess, but here's a small section that I think tries to do a rolling average.
(so what's wrong with the ptbypt version???)
@altenbach wrote:
I have no intention debugging this mess, but here's a small section that I think tries to do a rolling average.
...
(so what's wrong with the ptbypt version???)
I'm sure I have made something like this with shift registers, when I was using LV 5.0 and was new to LabVIEW.
