BreakPoint
Carnac the Magnificient - sarcastic answers to serious questions/comments
@JÞB wrote:
Hey! Carnac, Over Here!
Yup, a sarcastic post to a sarcastic reply from Carnac himself linking right back to the Breakpoint! And, left inline on the original thread
That's gotta be worth kudos.
I think that's actually a constructive post from Carnac himself to a sarcastic reply from me?
My post (basically "google it") wasn't actually meant to be sarcastic. But if the answer is a link to the exact same question, it actually asked for.
Search LabVIEW like a graph! 
How granular do you get with your functional requirements?
The requirements shall be written as if the person validating them is a psychopathic lawyer who knows your address and will sue you for your house if your wording isn't airtight.
@jcarmody wrote:
The requirements shall be written as if the person validating them is a psychopathic lawyer who knows your address and will sue you for your house if your wording isn't airtight.
The requirement as written cannot be tested. Unless you get a list of all psychopathic lawyers and get them each to agree they won't sue you after reviewing the requirements.
Random thread gets a reply that is unrelated 11 years later:
SERIAL DATA TRANSMITION SENDING DATA TO SAME PC USING 2 PORTS
@Hooovahh wrote:
Random thread gets a reply that is unrelated 11 years later:
SERIAL DATA TRANSMITION SENDING DATA TO SAME PC USING 2 PORTS
Pretty sure that's spam. The other 2 (out of 3) posts are random as well.
