Linux Users

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Event structure behaves weird, bug?

I'm quite new on Linux Desktop, currently using LV 2020 Sp1 on OpenSuse

 

The event structure behave differently on Linux and Windows, is that normal or event documented somewhere?

 

See in attached vi, the VI is broken because  a constant is connected to the timeout terminal but there is no timeout event to handle it.

 

bug.png

 

Also the texts displayed are all weird, see below, I guess this is a localization issue, right? :

Capture d’écran 2021-09-09 121712.png

Capture d’écran 2021-09-09 121754.png

Capture d’écran 2021-09-09 121940.png

   


We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.

Epictetus

Antoine Chalons

Message 1 of 4
(189 Views)

Thank you for reporting this. It does look like a bug and I'm following up to make sure this is investigated further.

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(126 Views)

I attempted to reproduce this in OpenSUSE 15.2 w/ LabVIEW 2020 SP1 and could not recreate the garbled event structure case lists like your screenshots show. Here is what I see...

 

Are you running a localized OS? I know LabVIEW on Linux is not currently localized, but we've also not seen issues reported with localization strings showing up wonky like this! Please let me know if you still have details to share about your configuration and I'll dig further.

 

Thanks!

 

2021-10-19 at 9.08 AM.png

 

-RDR

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(103 Views)

Thanks for your answer, no, I'm not using a localized Linux.

 

I create on LV2020 on Windows a VI that simply contains a method node to close the FP :

TiTou_0-1634721298132.png

 

If I transfer it to my Linux VM, and open it, I get this :

TiTou_1-1634721392657.png

If I run that VI on Linux, it does close the FP though... quite annoying.

I tried on a Ubuntu 20, it does the same.

 


We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.

Epictetus

Antoine Chalons

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(87 Views)