Remake For Loop

[v_strane_chudes]

Message Edited by Laura F. on 06-07-2010 02:03 PM

[v_strane_chudes]

lol misprint

[RavensFan]

You are going to have to sell us on this one.

Why do you think this suggestion is necessary?  What is the benefit?

[tst]

You don't have to wire anything into the N terminal. Almost all of my for loops are auto-indexed and for the few that aren't, a wire going into the N terminal is fine.

[jlokanis]

Sometimes you do want to change the value going to N at runtime.  Making it a contant like this seems useless and a bad idea.

[Hecuba]

I believe it is a good idea, you will be able to do the same thing you have done up to now with for loops, but when you need a constant value you will not create a constant, just type the value needed.

[RavensFan]

I don't think the amount of effort you save by not having to create a constant to wire in is not worth the trouble of making another variation of the For Loop.  Actually, I think it would take longer since wiring a constant in is a pretty quick LabVIEW creation.  Waiting for a dialog box to pop up so that you can set the value of N for the For Loop will take longer.

[Darren]

Any idea that has received less than 9 kudos within 9 years after posting will be automatically declined.