Rube Goldberg Code

[Henrik_Volkers]

Seen here:

[SteveChandler]

This construct is very similar to the first reply in this thread. Maybe the following code was posted in one of the other many replies.

Found in a code review.

[Seth_B.]

Sadly, I have run into something in a similar vein recently:

[SteveChandler]

How many ways can this be done?

Maybe the authors of these rb's are trying to get around the fact that there is only a 1mS delay available in the pallettes?

[JÞB]

---

@Steve Chandler wrote:

How many ways can this be done?

Maybe the authors of these rb's are trying to get around the fact that there is only a 1mS delay available in the pallettes?

---

+inf....

Ahem.... there is a 0mS delay available (but it does do something useful)

[Ben]

---

@Jeff Bohrer wrote:

---

@Steve Chandler wrote:

How many ways can this be done?

Maybe the authors of these rb's are trying to get around the fact that there is only a 1mS delay available in the pallettes?

---

+inf....

Ahem.... there is a 0mS delay available (but it does do something useful)

---

That is just the LV verions of the old riddle about two doors one always lies the other never but you can only ask one question.

Spoiler

Answer You ask one door what the other door would say

and then invert the answer.

Ben

[altenbach]

Another one of these sighting (top of image). Below is a fully functional code alternative, a wire!

Seen here

[PaulG.]

Debounce circuit? 

[GuenterMueller]

---

@PaulG. wrote:

Debounce circuit?

---

Did you profile both implementations?
Guenter

[altenbach]

---

@PaulG. wrote:

Debounce circuit? 

---

Au contraire, It actually made my brain circuits bounce for a few seconds. 😄