|
|||||||||||||
I think it would be a great idea to allow the sequence adapter to expand containers like the CVI and LabVIEW adapters do when you are editing the module for the step.
See attachment.
I like it!
How would you support the idea of "do not check type" that is available for Sequence call step type parameters but not necessairly for those others?
Warren,
You could ideally choose to pass in a container, or the individual components of the container. If you chose to pass in the container, it wouldn't neccessariy check type.
This would enable us to use static calls to sequences as parameters and limits rather than relying on importing property object files. Want!
You must be a registered user to add a comment here. If you've already registered, please log in. If you haven't registered yet, please register and log in.
Post New Idea to submit a product idea. Be sure to submit a separate post for each idea. Note: the TestStand Idea Exchange is not the appropriate forum to submit technical support questions.The TestStand R&D team is committed to reviewing every idea submitted via the TestStand Idea Exchange. However, we cannot guarantee the implementation of any TestStand Idea Exchange submission until further documented.
My Profile | Privacy |
Legal |
Contact NI
© 2011 National Instruments Corporation. All rights reserved. | E-Mail this Page
|
||

E-Mail this Page