LabVIEW Idea Exchange

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
moderator1983

Option to convert an instance of Strict Type Def. control to Type Def. (non strict) control

Status: Declined

Any idea that has received less than 3 kudos within 3 years after posting will be automatically declined.

The main idea here is, to have an option (say Make Non-Strict Type Def.), on selecting which, the instance (of a Strict Type Def.) will still be updated based on any data-type related changes (and not cosmetic changes) made in the original definition.

For reference: What is the Difference Between Type Definitions and Strict Type Definitions?

 

Make Non-Strict Type Def.

 

I found following ideas similar:

1. Independence from Strict Type Definition without Representations.

2. Allow Strict Type Def of Type Def.


I am not allergic to Kudos, in fact I love Kudos.

 Make your LabVIEW experience more CONVENIENT.


2 Comments
PaulG.
Active Participant

All of these are similar so I kudo'd all of them. I would like the option of having one type def non-strict in one instance and strict in another. I try to avoid stricts because they break too often when working with their properties.

PaulG.

LabVIEW versions 5.0 - 2020

“All programmers are optimists”
― Frederick P. Brooks Jr.
Darren
Proven Zealot
Status changed to: Declined

Any idea that has received less than 3 kudos within 3 years after posting will be automatically declined.