Rube Goldberg Code

[Coq_Rouge]

Sorry all is my fault actualy. I was 100% sure i saw the Array Subset function.  

Message Edited by t06afre on 12-18-2008 05:38 PM

Message Edited by t06afre on 12-18-2008 05:39 PM

[smercurio_fc]

Yet another example of using Select instead of Boolean operations:

From here.

[Intaris]

In fairness, the lower selector (F) of the upper select function is not guaranteed to be false, at least not from the picture provided.

We also can't see what the ? is wired to in the lower select function.....

So they may at least have proper functionality.  True, it could be done with an OR statement, but I personally don't see the problem with the Select method.

Shane.

Message Edited by Intaris on 12-27-2008 06:34 PM

[smercurio_fc]

The link I provided has the original code. The use of the 2 Select functions can be done more succinctly with an OR and an AND gate.

[smercurio_fc]

Small RG code dealing with converting a number to a 24-bit small-endian data string. We can do a bunch of array gymnastics, or just use the Flatten To String function:

 

From here.

[TCPlomp]

Any reason we don't reverse the string in the lower section?

Ton

[smercurio_fc]

---

TonP wrote:

Any reason we don't reverse the string in the lower section?

---

reverse the string? I'm not sure what you're referring to.

[TCPlomp]

Sorry I missed that the upper part was the clean part.

In the lower part there is a superb 'Node Equivalent' section:

Ton

Message Edited by TonP on 01-26-2009 09:52 PM

[Ray.R]

Good catch Ton,

As you noticed, the bottom one was the RG.  The top one was cleaned.  Both solutions are good.  I don't know if one would actually be better than the other..  Comments anyone (on preference)?

R

[Ben]

Advanced PID fromthis thread. 

Ben