Multifunction DAQ

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Calibration

Solved!
Go to solution

Hi,

I have bought NI-9174 chassis 6 months ago, does it require calibration on yearly basis?

 

Kumaresan

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 5
(859 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author Kumaresan.mech

cDAQ chassis does not need to be calibrated.

See Finding the Calibration Interval for an NI Device

-------------------------------------------------------
Applications Engineer | TME Systems
https://tmesystems.net/
-------------------------------------------------------
https://github.com/ZhiYang-Ong
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 5
(824 Views)

Just curious, why NI DAQs don't require calibration? I'm sure those DAQ board's component might experience a deviation over a period. Anyone, have you experienced any such issues (~delta) while comparing DAQ output vs other instruments results?

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 5
(151 Views)

It may be the case that the accuracy specs are wide enough to accommodate the component variation over time.

Santhosh
Soliton Technologies

New to the forum? Please read community guidelines and how to ask smart questions

Only two ways to appreciate someone who spent their free time to reply/answer your question - give them Kudos or mark their reply as the answer/solution
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 5
(140 Views)

I came across this discussion while searching for information on the necessity to follow the NI calibration procedure for cDAQ Chassis and Controllers (cDAQ-917x).

 

The accepted response seems reasonable if the time base referenced (and verified) by the procedure is not used in any chassis involved applications.

However, it is not clear to me whether the chassis time base is only relevant when directly referencing chassis resources such as its counter/timers or if the time base is always being used.

 

Does anyone have any insight into what functions the cDAQ-917x chassis time base serves and whether the aforementioned NI calibration procedure may be considered 'optional'?

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 5
(12 Views)