Tunnelling Problem

[nevica]

Hello,

Here is the .vi. Very much appreciate your help. Could you explain the new things you do to it. Thanks,

Nevica

[Guruthilak]

I am using LV 2010. Please save it to previous version and send

[Questionmarker]

I also use LV2010. Maybe exchange the stacked sequency to a flattened one and have a look at the wiring; I am quite sure that you will immediately see some wires that you did not intend to be like that...

The upper box I was using was an error cluster constant, the other one is the "merge error.vi" you will find it in your functions palette.

[Yamaeda]

A rather simple way to get rid of the sequence and avoid the multi connectors is to replace it with a For/While loop and Case structure connected to 'i'. Then you can send your error out to a shift register and use the same connection on all.

Even better is to change the case connection with a enum with a descriptive name, then each case will describe what it does.

Then you can bundle up the functionality in each case/sequence frame into a sub-vi of it's own and simply wire them together. 🙂

/Y

[NIquist]

---

@Yamaeda wrote:

A rather simple way to get rid of the sequence and avoid the multi connectors is to replace it with a For/While loop and Case structure connected to 'i'. Then you can send your error out to a shift register and use the same connection on all.

Even better is to change the case connection with a enum with a descriptive name, then each case will describe what it does.

Then you can bundle up the functionality in each case/sequence frame into a sub-vi of it's own and simply wire them together. 🙂

/Y

---

Kind of like a machine with... states???  Brilliant!

[Yamaeda]

Kind of like a machine with... states???  Brilliant!

😉 Sneak the idea onto them.

/Y