LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LabVIEW 2025Q3 .NET core memory leak!

This is consistent even with built-in .NET functions.

See the attached VI where it's just generating some GUIDs.

 

It takes almost 2 orders of magnitude to run the .NET Core version.

You can see the memory drift as well if you have Process Manager open.

0 Kudos
Message 21 of 26
(308 Views)

@jyoung8711 wrote:

Just an FYI the latest patch : 26.1.1.49193-0+f41 (released this week) did NOT fix this issue 😞 


According to patch notes memory leak got already fixed with latest patch Bug Fixes 26Q1 

Actor Framework
0 Kudos
Message 22 of 26
(250 Views)

@Quiztus2 wrote:

@jyoung8711 wrote:

Just an FYI the latest patch : 26.1.1.49193-0+f41 (released this week) did NOT fix this issue 😞 


According to patch notes memory leak got already fixed with latest patch Bug Fixes 26Q1 


There's another post about this where someone from R&D (I think) chimed in and said they thought it was fixed, and that they did some memory optimization... I think they missed the core issue though 😞 

 

The patch notes were not posted when I did my initial testing.

0 Kudos
Message 23 of 26
(239 Views)

I’ve finally had time to test the memory leak issue again.
=> The problem is still there 😞
The memory leak is slightly less severe, but it’s still there. Come on, NI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

What can I say? Does NI understand the "definition of done"?

 

 

Cloedu72_0-1776677529493.png

 

CLA / CTD
Message 24 of 26
(151 Views)

@Cloedu72 wrote:

I’ve finally had time to test the memory leak issue again.
=> The problem is still there 😞
The memory leak is slightly less severe, but it’s still there. Come on, NI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

What can I say? Does NI understand the "definition of done"?

 

 

Cloedu72_0-1776677529493.png

 


Sometimes you think it's fixed but it's not. If you are a CLA you should know this.

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 25 of 26
(118 Views)

@jyoung8711 wrote:

This is consistent even with built-in .NET functions.

See the attached VI where it's just generating some GUIDs.

 

It takes almost 2 orders of magnitude to run the .NET Core version.

You can see the memory drift as well if you have Process Manager open.


 

Unrelated and a complete sidenote, but NewGuid is a static method and does not require a constructor node.

0 Kudos
Message 26 of 26
(66 Views)