01-20-2009 12:48 PM - edited 01-20-2009 12:49 PM
Cory K wrote:* You cannot use an XY graph as stated above, because that would require you had the same number of x's as y's.
Therefore, you cannot bundle array 1 vs array 2 because it would make the previously stated assumption
That is simply not correct. Evidence:
@cory K wrote:* I'm not exactly sure if there are any negative side effects of converting this to dynamic data, maybe someone could jump in and let me know if I should be avoiding that. However, assuming that it doesn't make any problems, it does work.
@Chris_VH wrote:
I can't think of any negative reactions to the conversion of dynamic data from a simple 1D array.
I can. What would be the point in doing so if there's no need for it?
01-20-2009 12:54 PM
You are correct smercurio. I misunderstood what Dan said in post 3 of this thread.
I thought he was bundling all of the Y values together.
If each x array has a y array of equal length. Everything should work out
01-22-2009 09:53 PM
Thanks smercurio for the help, your suggestion had solved my problem.
Thanks everybody for attention and suggestions.
Dan07
01-23-2009 08:13 AM
Cory K wrote:...* I'm not exactly sure if there are any negative side effects of converting this to dynamic data, maybe someone could jump in and let me know if I should be avoiding that. However, assuming that it doesn't make any problems, it does work.Message Edited by Cory K on 01-19-2009 01:36 PM
THe performance of dynamic data types is horendous!
One of my asociates (mellowbuck ) Flew off to consult with one of our customers on a performance issue. After a short time inspecting their code he got rid of the dynamic data types and shortly there after he was changing his flight plans to an earlier flight having accomplished his mission.
Ben