ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.

Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Accelerometer gives wrong signals

Dear all, 

 

I have a problem with the signal I got from an accelerometer. I am doing a drop test and I have mounted an accelerometer on the bullet dropped in free fall. The objective of the test is to measure the impact force.

 

The accelerometer is a single axis accelerometer with capacity of +/- 10000 g. The accelerometer is connected with an amplifier and then to the NI6361. The module is then connected with a PXI 1073. 

 

The bullet (steel) weight of 10.6 kg was dropped from 100 mm in a concrete base and the response I got was 3500g. I think this is unreasonable as the theoretical calculations in conjunction with the image analysis using a high speed camera provided me with the acceleration of 40g.

 

According to the supplier, each 1 Volt corresponds to 1000 g. Any help will be much appreciated. 

 

Thank you, 

Stath

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 27
(5,179 Views)

What does the waveform look like? Is it possible that you have very high acceleration for a very short time, corresponding to a point contact impact? What is the resonant frequency of the weight?

 

Lynn

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 27
(5,155 Views)

I am assuming the "g" stands for grams and not 9.81m/s^2. So what does it mean to have an acceleration of 40 grams?

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 27
(5,150 Views)

Lynn and Gregory


Thanks for your replies. I have attached how the graph looks like in a pdf file. g is the Earth's gravitational acceleration of around 9.81 m/s^2. Please find below how the scale was configured using MAX. 

 

Untitled.png

                                                                           

                                                                    

 

Acceleration values of around 4000g for a falling object dropped from 100 mm are unreasonable, I think.

 

Thanks, 

Stath

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 27
(5,136 Views)

Do you have a link to the product page?

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 27
(5,124 Views)

Can  you post the data sheet (or a link to it) for the accelerometer?

 

Lynn

Message 6 of 27
(5,120 Views)

@StathPol wrote:

Acceleration values of around 4000g for a falling object dropped from 100 mm are unreasonable, I think.


The acceleration during dropping will be ~1g. The decceleration on impact can easily be 4000g because it happens over a very, very short distance and time if the floor and object are relatively rigid. Numbers seem reasonable.

 

At impact, you object will be going at a speed of about 5km/hour and will deccelerate to zero over a very small fraction of a millimeter. Do the Math!

 

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 27
(5,114 Views)

Lynn, Altenbach and Gregory,

 

Thanks for your replies. I have attached the certificate for the one single axis accelerometer and the power supply settings. The signal is acquired using a voltage card and then is converted to g. 

 

Altenbach -- During the impact event, I measured the acceleration using a high speed camera which gives almost the same result with the theoretical calculation based on the steel-concrete pulse width (impact force-time). Today, I have tried to hit a load cell from a distance of 50 mm using a weight of 10.6 kg. Because it is steel-steel contact (elastic collision), we expect the higher forces to occur. So the softer the material is, the longer the pulse width will be. 

 

Again, I have a feeling that something is not correct with the settings using LabVIEW. I have checked many published papers that they used 600 kg from 1 meter free falling and the acceleration was not that high. 

 

Regards, 

Stath

 

0 Kudos
Message 8 of 27
(5,094 Views)

I am getting a drop time of .143s, and velocity 1.4m/s before hitting the ground. To have an acceleration of 4000g it has to lose this velocity in ~36us. Your graph separations are 1000us, so those spikes could be anywhere from 10-100us long, it does seem to make sense.

0 Kudos
Message 9 of 27
(5,092 Views)

0.5 mV/g * 10000 g = 5 V.

 

It appears from the fuzzy image you posted earlier that your scaling is reversed: 5000 g => 10 V.

 

Lynn

0 Kudos
Message 10 of 27
(5,084 Views)