I think I found a solution. It's gross! it took 4 attempts with completely different methods! but it just...might... work!
(it better work, i can't afford any more than this haha)
I'll be sure to let y'all know once I get it tested more. Right now I know for sure that
p is measured correctly, and the updates perfectly spaced relative to each other (
c and
d are correct), but I have to make sure that the beginning of
d is lining up with the pulse start (actually, that's not even very important; the width of
d which I have right already is the important part) and the
ap0/90 gap is correct (which is important).
Jarrod or Neil: can you send me an email if you get the chance? I have a question for you. The address is part of my profile which I figure you insiders have access to.
Side note: I have a very lazy non-engineer friend named Jarrod B. It's quite humorous to me to see you posting with that name as an engineer because my first thought is him.
Message Edited by 280Z28 on 08-02-2006 05:50 PM