Hey Alex, thank you so much for your trust in DQMH and for taking time out of your day to share your idea with us.
Based on our review, parallelization would have no noticeable benefit.
So, we decline this request as it is written, at least for the next DQMH version.
We will however consider speeding up the validation process and being able to pass a list of Modules to validate.
Again, thank you for your input; it is most appreciated. Please keep those ideas coming!
Running the validator on bigger projects takes quite long.
Would it be possible to speed up the process by running the validation of the modules in parallel?
Additionally: Also in CI/CD we know if the module has changed at all. It would be nice if the cli-module-validation could be called with a .lvlib instead of a .lvproj. Therefore, it could be handy to have a VI which lists all dqmh modules in a .lvproj.