Rube Goldberg Code

[smercurio_fc]

---

for(imstuck) wrote:

Seen here. In all fairness, he does say that he originally had no locals...

---

Are you referring to the circled item? How is that a Rube Goldberg? Seems to me like it might ahave just been a forgotten copy and paste, and forgot to delete the original.

[GregFreeman]

More the locals. The waits aren't really "exceedingly" complex 🙂

[smercurio_fc]

Then it's probably a better candidate for the local variables thread. 

[Yamaeda]

A Noop must be the simplest of operations, so WEQ and Goldberg NOOPs are subsets of Rube Goldberg coding (RGC? Rugoc?) Lovely thread, i have alot of this at work! /Y

[RavensFan]

Never mind.  I thought I had a Rube, but on closer inspection it wasn't.

Message Edited by Ravens Fan on 02-20-2010 08:30 PM

[Yamaeda]

Some nice RGC. 🙂

 

/Y

Message Edited by Yamaeda on 02-22-2010 12:52 PM

[muks]

And it is a subvi.....

And where did you find that?

[Yamaeda]

It's from a project i'm working on.

(No code bigger than an 800x600 screen, controls = declarations ==> Localitis and sequentitis) 

/Y

Message Edited by Yamaeda on 02-22-2010 01:17 PM

[muks]

And may i ask why that local variable when you have a straight road with a nice visibility?

[Yamaeda]

... then the controls isn't pure declarations ... (i changed it), though to be up to spec it really should be an extra step in the sequence with the locals.