05-23-2006 03:51 PM
I also am a binary rater.
But I do like to have the ability to do so.
05-23-2006 04:32 PM
CC, I did as you requested and single-starred you. I'm hoping this won't make you trusted.
Now I want to see if people get an itch to either "fix" it or pay me back in kind.
05-23-2006 06:53 PM - edited 05-23-2006 06:53 PM
@ColinAE wrote:
I also am a binary rater.
But I do like to have the ability to do so.
So what's wrong with that?
Binary rating. And the ability to do so... If you like the post, give a star if you don't, then don't give any...
1 or 0
Simple
Message Edited by JoeLabView on 05-23-2006 07:57 PM
05-24-2006 07:08 AM
OK, I see that people did get the itch to fix it.
Here's something I don't understand - in the LIST from a couple of days ago JLV justly had an averge rating of 4.8, yet when I look at his profile now he's "Trusted" with a 4.4 average. How did this happen? Molly?
05-24-2006 07:30 AM
Back on subject!
I'll go along with the others who are talking about the "Rate/No-rate" option.
I also like the idea of tracking the total number of postive indications.
For the community to grow and prosper we have to work together.
Allowing a mecahnism to "bad moth" (so to speak) others just does not seem to help build the team work within the community.
Ben