Real-Time Measurement and Control

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NI-9237 and Voltage Divider

I'm still limited to make the best out what i have. Using Voltage Divider, I have a quite consistent Modified Factor = Theoretical Factor / 1.11
Rd = Divider Resistance (e.g., 350)
RL= Load Resistance
RdL = Divider+Load leg resistance = (1/Rd + 1/RL)^-1
Applied Excitation (original) = 1V
Updated Excitation on that leg = 1 * RdL  / (Rd + RdL) and as I mentioned earlier, I checked using DVM and this Updated Excitation is matching with calculation.
Thus, theoretically signal will be reduced to this value: Vout_theoretical = Vout_supposed_to_if_no_Divider * RdL  / (Rd + RdL).
               Theoretical Factor = (Rd + RdL) / Rdl
But in reality, Modified Factor = Theoretical Factor / 1.11
I just need to be able to track down why on Signal, it is quite consistent that the signal is increased by about 9% to 11% (compared to the Vout_supposed_to_if_no_Divider)

0 Kudos
Message 11 of 12
(66 Views)

Since, you're adding external components (whose performance is not characterized), your accuracy specifications are no longer valid for the units of measure as your external components is altering the performance unpredictably (a case you already noticed why your calculations don't match the actual measurement).

 

If you're relying on these measurements for internal, non-critical observations, it may be fine. But if you're going to rely on these numbers to characterize or design other systems or guarantee some numbers to customers, I advise against doing so.

Santhosh
Soliton Technologies

New to the forum? Please read community guidelines and how to ask smart questions

Only two ways to appreciate someone who spent their free time to reply/answer your question - give them Kudos or mark their reply as the answer/solution.

Finding it hard to source NI hardware? Try NI Trading Post
Message 12 of 12
(39 Views)