From Saturday, Nov 23rd 7:00 PM CST - Sunday, Nov 24th 7:45 AM CST, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

Real-Time Measurement and Control

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Array does Not resolve to a Fixed Size error

Solved!
Go to solution

Hey

 

I'm using the NI-9223 module. I want to be able to choose which inputs I want to acquire every time I run the VI. For that I used a lot of case structures, I tried on simulation and it functions. But when I tried to compile the code I got this error "Array Does Not Resolve to a Fixed Size".

 

I thought all of the arrays I used were with a fixed size, but now I'm not sure. Is this error occuring because for each case I have a different array wired to the output tunnel? 

 

And is this case structure the best solution to dinamically choose the inputs?

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 6
(394 Views)

You have different lengths of arrays going to the same output tunnel in different cases.  For instance, case 0 has an empty array while case 1 has a 1 element array.  Since the maximum length in the cases is 4, you need to make all of the output arrays a length of 4.  To help your FIFOs, you can also output the number of elements that need to be sent (wire to the N on the FOR loop).


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 6
(371 Views)

What do you mean "to help your FIFOs"?

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 6
(356 Views)

In my opinion, it is a waste of FPGA resources to have multiple relatively similar cases, with only one of them being active and the rest remaining idle most of the time.

 

I would program to write all 4 channels to the FIFO, then filter the data from selected channels on the host size.

-------------------------------------------------------
Control Lead | Intelline Inc
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 6
(350 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author euqinom2727

@ZYOng wrote:

In my opinion, it is a waste of FPGA resources to have multiple relatively similar cases, with only one of them being active and the rest remaining idle most of the time.

 

I would program to write all 4 channels to the FIFO, then filter the data from selected channels on the host size.


This is good advice.  The only difference I would do is wire up the N to the FOR loops that write to the FIFOs.  Doing this, the FPGA can limit what data goes up to the host.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 6
(344 Views)

Thank you guys!

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 6
(300 Views)