07-26-2018 07:28 PM
Is there a way to print/store to file .seq source listings the way they show in the Steps: Window?
Tools -> sequence documentation prints the .seq files out in a completely different format. I've tried Windows Snipping Tool with mixed success.
Googling this topic has produced little.
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-30-2018 09:01 AM
I use SnagIt. Unfortunately you need a license for it:
https://support.techsmith.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001293232-Scroll-to-Capture
Do you just need the step names or the icons as well? It would be really easy to make a tool to grab all the step names and list them.
07-30-2018 12:42 PM
snagIt certainly looks promising.
Just how could one grab the step names. That is not immediately obvious.
Thanks
07-31-2018 07:59 AM
If the goal is to capture a "scrolling screen" I use this https://github.com/ShareX/ShareX it`s free and I think it does a pretty decent work. It has some other useful functions.
07-31-2018 01:30 PM
I threw this together real quick to demonstrate how to do it. Let me know if you have any questions.
07-31-2018 02:33 PM
Wow. That seems advanced. It fails with "The selected sequence file does not contain a sequence named MainSequence." when I try to run it. I have to admit I'm a newbie at this. Is this supposed to prompt me for a .seq file, or is it trying to open some default file that I don't have that is causing failure.
Your time is much appreciated.
Don
07-31-2018 03:29 PM
I'd like to capture something that could be saved, then printed out as documentation for a .seq file. This certainly is a way to record it. Thanks for the suggestion.
08-01-2018 08:48 AM
It's because you are trying to run it with your process model. Just right click on the GetStepNames sequence and select Run GetStepNames.
Yes it prompts for a sequence file.
Ideally you would make this a tool and just analyze the sequence file they had opened. However, I did it this way just to demonstrate what was possible without forcing you to go through the tool creation process.
08-01-2018 12:42 PM
Thanks again!
This is quite nice. Now I see how to run it.
Clearly I have much more to learn about Teststand.