01-05-2012 02:31 PM
Can anyone please help get this model from VISHAY to work?
*Jan 2, 2006 *Doc. ID: 77342, S-52635, Rev. B *File Name: SUP90P06-09L_PS.txt and SUP90P06-09L_PS.lib .SUBCKT SUP90P06-09L 4 1 2 M1 3 1 2 2 PMOS W=16804728u L=0.25u M2 2 1 2 4 NMOS W=16804728u L=0.45u R1 4 3 RTEMP 3.4E-3 CGS 1 2 5800E-12 DBD 4 2 DBD *************************************************************** .MODEL PMOS PMOS ( LEVEL = 3 TOX = 5E-8 + RS = 3.5E-3 RD = 0 NSUB = 1.5E17 + KP = 4E-6 UO = 400 + VMAX = 0 XJ = 5E-7 KAPPA = 5E-2 + ETA = 1E-4 TPG = -1 + IS = 0 LD = 0 + CGSO = 0 CGDO = 0 CGBO = 0 + NFS = 0.8E12 DELTA = 0.1) *************************************************************** .MODEL NMOS NMOS ( LEVEL = 3 TOX = 5E-8 +NSUB = 3.5E16 NFS = 1E12 TPG = -1) *************************************************************** .MODEL DBD D (CJO=740E-12 VJ=0.38 M=0.35 +RS=0.1 FC=0.5 IS=1E-12 TT=6E-8 N=1 BV=60.2) *************************************************************** .MODEL RTEMP RES (TC1=11E-3 TC2=5.5E-6) *************************************************************** .ENDS
01-06-2012 01:53 PM
Hi cfmiteq,
This model seems to be working. I made a simulation only component and added this spice model and it seemed to simulate without a problem.
Here is a link to a demo which shows how you can create a custom component in Multisim.
https://decibel.ni.com/content/groups/circuit/blog/2011/04/06/component-creation-101
Hope this helps.
01-06-2012 02:07 PM
In step 6, how do I know what model pins correspond to G,S,D?
I was only able to get this model to work by changing
.SUBCKT SUP90P06-09L 4 1 2
to
.SUBCKT SUP90P06-09L 3 2 1
01-09-2012 02:09 PM
Hi cfmiteq,
In most models, they generally mention which pin corresponds to which symbol pin which makes it easy to map them. I was not able to find out exactly which pins map to which model pins. You will need to play around with it a bit to see which combination works in the appropriate manner.
Sorry I could not be of more help.
01-09-2012 02:13 PM
I beleive I did, changing "4 1 2" to "3 2 1".
I am still confused how you were able to work the simulation without this change.