LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

very challenging situation...LabVIEW experts are all invited......

thanks a lot guys.

 

i will do my best and try to ask more specific questions.

 

waiting for your smart solutions!

 

 

warm regards

0 Kudos
Message 11 of 23
(1,832 Views)

battler. wrote:
Are you for real?

 

I find it amusing that you should say that.

___________________
Try to take over the world!
Message 12 of 23
(1,819 Views)

tst wrote:

battler. wrote:
Are you for real?

 

I find it amusing that you should say that.

I thought pretty much the same thing(*cough* RTOS hard drive size problem *cough*)!

 

Dont worry, in a few hours when his personality switches again he will be more polite 😉

 

(tougue, cheek, etc).

Message 13 of 23
(1,806 Views)

by the way guys, i didn't get the joke.......

 

 

 

have a nice day CLD (s)

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 23
(1,805 Views)

Which one?

 

PJM



  


vipm.io | jki.net

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 23
(1,789 Views)

all of them.....hahaha.....

 

 

 

nice and funny labview veterans.

 

 

have a nice day gentle men

 

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 16 of 23
(1,777 Views)

In my first reply I included a link that has a link for "threadconfig".

 

That utility will let you configure how many threads LV uses. That could be used to benchmark your code across multiple cores.

 

The Timed seq structure has an input to let you dictate which core to run the code in. You could use these to run your code in sepearate dedicated cores.

 

Are any of these idea getting close?

 

If not tell us more about what you hope would would say and we'll try tickling another part of our brains.

 

Confused on your request but still trying,

 

Ben

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
Message 17 of 23
(1,749 Views)

my sincere gratitude and respect to you Master " BEN "

 

your last reply is really an awesome solution, sorry again for not putting my main problem in the right way as i'm still doing my literature review, BUT, with such EXPERTS by my side, i can go ahead in my project  no matter how it's difficult.

 

 

DEAR BEN, i will do my best to ask about more specific and clear questions....including photos and extra links to get u guys on the right road.

 

 

 warm regards

 

LabVIEW and its EXPERTS lover

0 Kudos
Message 18 of 23
(1,747 Views)

I'm probably going to get some flak for saying this, but I think somebody has to ... It's fairly obvious that your first language isn't English, so I'm not sure how much of this you will be able to understand. First things first: you need to cut back on the "master", "experts", "lover", "awesome", "most favorite", and overall over-the-top flattering comments. Regardless of how Americans may be caricaturized in films, most do not respond well to such buttering up. Some may use a bit more of a harsh terms, but let's just leave it at that. I'll grant you that it may be a language issue, but I doubt it. On a more fundamental level, you're supposed to be studying for a PhD. You should learn to be a bit more professional, especially on a public forum.

 

With regards to your question(s): You are too vague. It's not clear whether you're asking about multiprocessor/multicore capabilities of LabVIEW, or what algorithms to use for smart antennas.  We can't answer the second question - that's your field. If you need help in this area then your best bet on this is to ask an RF engineer. As for multithreading/multicore, we're not sure what it is that you want. LabVIEW, like other modern programming languages is multiprocessor/multicore capable. But just because it is, it doesn't mean it will do you any good because it's completely dependent on the application that you write, which ultimately goes back to the algorithm. This has nothing to do with LabVIEW, as this applies to all programming languages. What if your algorithm is so complex that a single machine, even if it has 4 processors isn't enough? What if you need a distributed processing implementation, like the Folding@Home or SETI search projects? That's a completely different ball-game, and nobody here is likely to be able to help you, even if you "love" LabVIEW so much that you want to do it with that. 

 

Basically, what I'm saying is that I think you need to better define the problem first, establish the scope, outline the boundaries, and get a better handle on what this algorithm of yours is. Saying that you want it on a multicore platform is meaningless if you haven't yet defined what "it" is.

Message 19 of 23
(1,739 Views)

smercurio_fc wrote:

I'm probably going to get some flak for saying this, but I think somebody has to ... ....


No flak from me.

 

LabVIEW lover,

 

I have been replying to you in good faith that you are really what you claim to be. Some of the previous jokes where tongue in the cheeks references to the fact your posting don't seem real. You may be too young to have heard about it but back in the day of the main-frame there was a program that would emulate a psychiatrist. It would ask a generic question and wait for you to reply. It would parse out the nouns and verbs and then generate another question... "Tell me about your mother." etc.

 

There are also some people in the world that entertain themselves by poking at forums like this one.

 

So...

 

"Are you real or are you Memorex?"

 

Hmmmm?

 

Ben

 

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
Message 20 of 23
(1,733 Views)