ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.

Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

scale daqmx

Solved!
Go to solution

Hi,

 

I have one question (probably stupid!): I'm acquiring data with a PCI-6281. What I want to measure is a voltage in the scale of nV. But if my values are bigger than 10nV, my software doesn't record the good value. I know the range for my card is between -10 and 10V. So how can I change the scale to record correctly values bigger than 10nV?

 

Here is my simple software in LV 8.2.

 

thanks for your help!

 

Sophie

 

PS: I'm acquiring data at 300kHz and I need to acquire during 1min. So i'm saving the values in multiple files in order to have the possibility to make the analysis after the record. If I want to save in one file, this one is too big and LV crashes...if you have any suggestion, I'm open! Smiley Wink

Download All
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 17
(4,419 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author stage84

Hi there

 

1. The data sheet fpr the PCI-6281 says valid Voltage ranges: ±10 V, ±5 V, ± 2 V, ±1 V, ±0.5 V, ± 0.2 V, ± 0.1 V, so adjust the "minimum value" and "maximum value" of "DAQmx Create Virtual Channel.vi" to ± 0.1 V for highest accuracy.

 

2. Your loosing data at the "Array to spreadsheet string" function, because you're formatting only with "%.3f ". Save the data as binary 2D DBL-Array and convert to string representation when analysing the data offline, but with more significant digits, e.g. "%.6e". This will also increase performance of DAQ.

 

3. You should separate the DAQ from the File-IO part. In your VI the DAQ has to wait for the File-IO to finish before acquiring the next data samples. During this you will not acquire any data. Take a look at the producer/consumer design pattern (File->New->VI->From Template->Frameworks\Design Patterns).

 

4. For file names you may consider to use a name containing date and time. Try the "Format date/time string" function and use "Data_%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S.dat" as format specifier. You then won't need to check if the file already exists. This will also increase performance.

 

Best regards
chris

CL(A)Dly bending G-Force with LabVIEW

famous last words: "oh my god, it is full of stars!"
Message 2 of 17
(4,400 Views)

Hi Chris,

 

thanks a lot for your answer! I have changed my VI as you suggested. I just don't understand the last point for the file name....

 

best regards,

 

Sophie

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 17
(4,390 Views)
Take a look at the attachment
Best regards
chris

CL(A)Dly bending G-Force with LabVIEW

famous last words: "oh my god, it is full of stars!"
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 17
(4,386 Views)

Could you please save the file in LV 8.2?

 

thanks

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 17
(4,381 Views)
Yes
Best regards
chris

CL(A)Dly bending G-Force with LabVIEW

famous last words: "oh my god, it is full of stars!"
0 Kudos
Message 6 of 17
(4,378 Views)

Hi,

 

I have just tested the software with the real set-up but I still have the problem of scale...Before changing the min and max ( I put it at +-10), my values were about 5nV but I cannot I have something above 10nV. Now with the scale of +- 0.1V, I cannot obtain a value above 0.1nV... Where is the problem?

 

thanks for your answer!

 

Sophie

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 17
(4,372 Views)

Do you have an amplifier in front of your device? If I understand your post, you are trying to measure voltages in the order of nv (10**-9 v). If you set device to the most sensitive mode, +/- .1 V it has a resolution of 700 nV at best.

0 Kudos
Message 8 of 17
(4,371 Views)
Yes I have an amplifier...
0 Kudos
Message 9 of 17
(4,368 Views)
It looks like you have a problem with the scaling of your amplifier. You will need to adjust it to match your requirements. Remember the unit measures +/- V and has a limit of 18 bits. This gives you a resolution of 262144 values or about a dynamic range 10**5 order (if you measure only positive volts). If you want to measure a 100 nV then your resoultion will be at best .001 nV
0 Kudos
Message 10 of 17
(4,359 Views)