LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

multicore toolkit


@rolfk wrote:

Your code example may actually have a possible flaw.

Yes, I mentioned that. I typically do an array sum or array max (after the timing sequence!) followed by autoinidexing of the resulting scalar. It does not seem to make a difference in my above code so I left it out.

0 Kudos
Message 11 of 24
(1,602 Views)

 


Hi altenbach

i have LabVIEW 2016Smiley Sad, please can u convert the attached AxB-Parallel002.vi to 2016   

 

0 Kudos
Message 12 of 24
(1,592 Views)

that is great,

indeed i optimized my vi to some what like urs Smiley Wink but i wired the iteration to case structure, of coarse ur vi is the best.

in the time speed result, could i save the result for each execution (each #of points)?? 

0 Kudos
Message 13 of 24
(1,582 Views)

@ssara wrote:

 

i have LabVIEW 2016Smiley Sad, please can u convert the attached AxB-Parallel002.vi to 2016   


Here's 2015 version that you should be able to open. Make sure you have the MASM toolkit installed. (I also added a dummy output to definitely force the compiler to do all calculations).

 

Bench2.png

Message 14 of 24
(1,568 Views)

try downloading again.

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 24
(1,560 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

try downloading again.


thank u altenbach for ur prompt feedback. It has been extremely useful.

but the beginning question is : can i optimize the speedup more?? 

can i use parallel for loop with MASM??

i used it with plain the exe time is less than Multicore! 

any explanation for the mul mechanism ?