06-12-2007 09:17 AM
06-12-2007 11:28 AM
06-12-2007 11:37 AM
Anna,
I've been looking at your code, and I have a few questions.
First, how are you connecting the output to the input? Also, what are the input and output frequencies and rates that you have set?
As Jonah mentioned, it would also be great if you attached your subVI.
06-12-2007 12:21 PM
Hello, Paul,
Thank you for your reply. I attach the requested file (but, truly, I have not known before, that I use it, and I do not know its meaning at all).
Reply to Stephen, too:
The connection is made, using board BNC-2110, 8 wires inputs and 1 wire output are connected to this board, from one side, and to one point, from the other side. Nothing more.
I try to do a test as simple as possible . The input rate and output rate are the same and equal to 40000 (and constant for the simplicity, but its value really is not important, I tried 20000 and the situation is the same). Frequency (as a parameter of generator block) - can be changed. I use 2,5; 5,0; 10,0; 25,0; 50,0; 100. I've results (I change ONLY frequency parameter):
frequency as a set parameter - 2,5; 5,0; 10,0; 25,0; 50,0; (etc.)
real output frequency - 100Hz; 200Hz; 400Hz; 1kHz; 2kHz;
number of samples/cycle - 400; 200; 100; 40 20
I need to say, that the number of measured samples is constant and equal to 2000 per each channel (but I think, it should not have a meaning, because it has impact of number of cycles, not sample rate)
Thank you in advance.
Anna
06-12-2007 12:29 PM - edited 06-12-2007 12:29 PM
I use LabVIEW 8.0, DAQ board 6052E, drivers MAX 4.1.0.3001, if it is important.
Anna
Message Edited by mikhaylova_anna on 06-12-2007 12:29 PM
06-12-2007 01:05 PM
06-12-2007 02:27 PM
I've tried. It works properly. Thank you a lot, really.
(I've got the idea of synchronization from NI example Multi-Function-Synch AI-AO.vi - could you say me, if the example does not have a needed wave connection because only of example simplicity, or there is some principle difference between the example and my task - this question is to avoid the future mistakes)
Thank you again
Anna