06-27-2017 10:31 AM
@brico33 wrote:
-I've made this study on qtiplot before and it gave the following parameters : -2,3,0,-2 . When I put those parameters in the pogram I got a nice erf function
You might want to look at the order of parameters. If the third parameter is zero, all your x are the same and you get a horizontal line out of the model. As a first step you should use the model subVI using the parameter guesses and an x-ramp over the typical range to see if the output looks as expected. Did you do that?
06-29-2017 08:19 AM
Yes I've tested my subVI model and it works fine, I got a good erf function. I've also found other parameters more appropriate than the others one. But I've noticed something , when I start the program (with the run button sorry) all the first parameters are close to the best fit parameters except the parameter C which fluctuates a lot.
06-29-2017 10:44 AM
@brico33 wrote:
Yes I've tested my subVI model and it works fine, I got a good erf function. I've also found other parameters more appropriate than the others one. But I've noticed something , when I start the program (with the run button sorry) all the first parameters are close to the best fit parameters except the parameter C which fluctuates a lot.
Is that still the same as you uploaded earlier? How much is "a lot"?
How does the data look like?
Can you attach a new VI that contains default data (e.g. as diagram constant) and your typical starting values set to default of the control.