LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

communication between parrallel loops

implement ethernet connections in each loop 

next step: use a server on the other side of the internet Smiley Very HappySmiley Very Happy just because 127.0.0.1 is much to easy Smiley Tongue

 

Message Edited by Henrik Volkers on 01-27-2006 01:47 PM

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 11 of 23
(3,042 Views)
Great one Henrik..
 
One could also program two robots - one to write the data ona piece of paper, which is put into a cryptex (refer to Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code). This cryptex is transfered to the other robot (due to the fact that the data is in a cryptes you have it absolutely secure), which opens the cryptex to read the data again. To transfer the code of the cryptex, we could use the internet-method... :D:D:D:D:D
 
Ok - let's get serious again...

Message Edited by becktho on 01-27-2006 01:51 PM

Using LV8.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be afraid to rate a good answer... 😉
--------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Kudos
Message 12 of 23
(3,039 Views)
How about VISA write and read with a loopback connector on the serial port.
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 23
(3,028 Views)


@unclebump wrote:
How about VISA write and read with a loopback connector on the serial port.



its hard to find PC nowadays with two rs232 ports,  (mine has only one) BUT using the DTR/RTS and the parallel port pins allow communication.... or

More hardware would be a USB hub with two USB/Rs232 converter and null modem cable. But you can hide all that in one USB-Loopback-box with a single connectorSmiley Very HappySmiley Very Happy

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 14 of 23
(3,034 Views)
I liked that becktho...Smiley Very HappySmiley Very Happy My unofficial ***** rating for this.


nudalakasim

Message Edited by Nudala on 01-27-2006 07:36 AM

Message Edited by Nudala on 01-27-2006 07:38 AM

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 23
(3,034 Views)
0 Kudos
Message 16 of 23
(3,027 Views)

I really don't understand why you're all going these complicated ways. I think the simplest thing is just to let the user have 2 controls and just let them enter the data for each loop. This is even more versatile, because it can easily be used to have different data in each loop. Also, you won't need to hide the indicator because there will be 2 controls.

 

Debating with self...

OK, decided to be safe, so here it is - Smiley Very Happy


___________________
Try to take over the world!
0 Kudos
Message 17 of 23
(3,022 Views)
Has anyone considered telepathy?

AKA "this damn program is going to do what I want it to do, not what I'm telling it to do!"
0 Kudos
Message 18 of 23
(3,005 Views)
WoW..This has become a popular thread....Popular for the 'pun' ofcourseSmiley Wink

nudalAKasiM
0 Kudos
Message 19 of 23
(2,993 Views)

becktho wrote:
One could also program two robots - one to write the data ona piece of paper, which is put into a cryptex (refer to Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code). This cryptex is transfered to the other robot (due to the fact that the data is in a cryptes you have it absolutely secure), which opens the cryptex to read the data again. To transfer the code of the cryptex, we could use the internet-method... :D:D:D:D:D

Alternatively, you could use RFC1149 for the data transport. A working implementation is described HERE. 😄
Message 20 of 23
(2,980 Views)