LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

cRIO 9039 Timing error compiling FPGA when using 9215 module, but only when in slots 7 or 8

This had my colleague and I stumped for most of today!

 

The FPGA code that we have only does one thing. In a while loop it reads an analogue input from a 9215 module in calibrated mode and writes it to an indicator.

 

When the 9215 module is placed in slot 7 or 8 in the project, the following timing error appears at the end of every compilation:

"LabVIEW FPGA: The compilation failed due to timing violations.

Click the Investigate Timing Violation button to display the Timing Violation Analysis window."

 

We tried adding loop timing, using a FIFO, installing updates, different versions of windows, 3 different machines, turning it off and on again... to no avail. The only thing that "fixed" the problem was moving the module in the project to slots 1-6. Has anyone else come across this? Have I found a bug or a feature?!

 

We are running LabVIEW 16.0f5 (32-bit). The compilation tool being used is Xilinx Vivado 2015.4 (64-bit).

 

Certified LabVIEW Developer
Download All
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 2
(2,464 Views)

Seems like a bug to me. I tried compiling the code on the cloud server and got the same timing violation (with LV2017). I also tried pipelining the write to the control, but it also failed. Recreating the project configuration from scratch also results in a timing violation. The same code compiles successfully when targeting a cRIO 9035 + 9215 in slot 8. A cRIO 9039 with a lowly 9201 in slot 8 also produces a timing violation, so it definitely seems like a bug with the 9039 slot 7/8.

 

The timing violation results indicate a 0.00ns requirement was missed, which then refers to an internal IO port of dio78. The xilinx log has more info (attached), but is a bit beyond my understanding. A 0.00ns requirement does seem odd though.




Certified LabVIEW Architect
Unless otherwise stated, all code snippets and examples provided
by me are "as is", and are free to use and modify without attribution.
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 2
(2,425 Views)