ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.

Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

USB-201 - Measurement Computing

Has anyone done any data qcquisition with the USB-201 from Measurment Computing? I'd like to know what the pros and cons are to this. I am looking at this from a cost prospective.

 

http://www.mccdaq.com/usb-data-acquisition/USB-201.aspx

 

Thanks,

Eric

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(4,839 Views)

Hello,

 

I have never used this DAQ device, but its pricing looks very similar to the NI USB-6008 and 6009 low cost devices. You can have a look at their spec sheets to decide which is better for your application.

IMHO, I would go with the NI products, their price is just slightly higher, but you have more flexibility. For example, the USB-201 device's spec sheet states that you have a fixed AI range +-10 Volts (spec sheet). If you want to measure below 1V range, the 12 bit resolution can be problematic, depending on your applications and requirements.

 

The USB-6008 and 6009 has a minimum input range of 1 Volts, with 12 bit and 14 bits resolution, respectively (and there are 8 different settable voltage ranges). The only thing the USB-201 is better in, the 100 kHz sampling rate, compared to the USB-6008 (10 kHz) and 6009 (48 kHz), as I see...

 

So if you are happy with the 12 bits AI with fixed 10 Volts range, at 100 kHz sampling, buy the USB-201. If you need more flexibility with ranges, and 14 bits AI inputs, buy the NI USB-6009.

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(4,809 Views)

Thanks for the reply.

 

I seen the two NI products you mentioned. All I am after is getting a distance from these two distance sensors via a voltage reading. I think it will be a good learning expereince for me since this would be the 1st time doing some sort of data aquisition other than direct RS-232 to devices which I am used to.

 

Eric

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(4,805 Views)

Hmm, the sensors' output range is 10 Volts, so this fits to the mentioned USB-201 DAQ device. If I do not miscalculate, you have a 20 Volts span input (+-10 Volts) with 12 bits, it means you get a 20/4096=0.0048 Volts resolution.

If I interpret the sensor's datasheet properly, it shows a 2 micrometer resolution. With a maximum 10 Volts output at the max distance 120 mm, I think it gives about 1.6E-4 Volts step change in the output signal (assuming perfect linearity, which is not the case). So using the USB-201, you can only get about 1 order of magnitude worse resolution. So your distance resolution will be about 0.05 mm, 50 micrometer. If this value is OK for you, I think the USB-201 DAQ is a good choice.

However I am not sure if my above estimation is correct or not (I never worked with such configurations), maybe someone with more experience will post here and tells us 🙂

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(4,771 Views)