ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.

Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Setting maximum visible array rows from front panel using property nodes.

Hi EmHill,

 

I still don't know why you want to change the number of visible rows all the time. All you get is a very bad UX!

 

If you insist on this "feature" I don't know why you need to access the very same property 3 times:

check.png

(German LabVIEW: AnzZeilen=NumRows, VertBildlauf= VerticalScrollbar)

Edit: Maybe you need to adapt the inclusion rules of InRangeAndCoerce to your needs, I just used the defaults…

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 14
(1,270 Views)

Gerd.  With integers, limit options are always included for IR&C.  The Glyphs are simply a source of potential confusion.:(


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 12 of 14
(1,261 Views)

Hi Jeff,

 

With integers, limit options are always included for IR&C.

Nope, I just tested this with LV2017!

Using I32 I receive "out of range" for upper limit=3, input=3 and lower limit=1 with default coercion settings:

check.png

Coercion settings ("include upper limit") are affecting the result in this small snippet!

 

The help for IR&C also doesn't mention the behaviour as described by you. It only mentions not to mix up unsigned and signed inputs…

 

 

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 14
(1,256 Views)

@GerdW wrote:

Hi Jeff,

 

With integers, limit options are always included for IR&C.

Nope, I just tested this with LV2017!

Using I32 I receive "out of range" for upper limit=3, input=3 and lower limit=1 with default coercion settings:

check.png

Coercion settings ("include upper limit") are affecting the result in this small snippet!

 

The help for IR&C also doesn't mention the behaviour as described by you. It only mentions not to mix up unsigned and signed inputs…

 

 


My apologies, I was mobile at the time and could have been clearer. The Include U/L Limit options Do affect the In Range? output. but not the coerced(x) output.

Capture Start.PNG


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 14 of 14
(1,246 Views)