LabVIEW
Random Number Generator with Sub-VI
@aeastet wrote:
I think the reason to program something here is to teach the poster how to program. It is very obvious that they need to understand how things work. It is like in math class when you go through all of the work for proofs only to find out when you are all done that there is a way to do the same thing in two steps. Right?
Maybe. Maybe not.
In math the point is to prove things. In programming, the point can be, and more than often is, to make things work (for you and the computer).
I teach my employees to use what is available. I've seen too many home made Spreadsheet String To Array VIs... I'd be delighted if (s)he'd put a function on the diagram as a solution, instead of making something.
Search LabVIEW like a graph! 
@Frozen wrote:
Well, here is one reason not to use the white noise vi...
We'll add it to the list of unspecified things.
wiebe@CARYA wrote:
@Frozen wrote:
Well, here is one reason not to use the white noise vi...
We'll add it to the list of unspecified things.
I think the concern here was "Full Dev System" - although I cannot imagine a company (or, now that Community Edition is imminent) or individual would NOT meet that requirement. If you're working with base, it's probably time to do a little investing and go to at least full.
@billko wrote:
wiebe@CARYA wrote:
@Frozen wrote:
Well, here is one reason not to use the white noise vi...
We'll add it to the list of unspecified things.
I think the concern here was "Full Dev System"
Yes, that was how I read it. If base (or not full dev) is a requirement, it should be specified.
I wander if OP is still in?
