Some courses and learning paths on NI Learning Center may not appear on learner dashboards. Our team is actively investigating.
If you encounter access issues, please contact services@ni.com and include the learner’s name, email, service ID or EA number, and the list of required courses.
01-03-2006 05:17 AM
01-03-2006 08:48 AM
01-03-2006 11:01 PM
01-04-2006 03:12 AM
I'm pretty sure Windows believes that it knows better how a parallel port should behave than the BIOS and accordingly takes control of it. And with quite some BIOSes this might even be true too.
@SamiKotijarvi wrote:
We have actually changed parallel port mode from BIOS, but the behaviour was the same in all modes. We didn't check what the device manager says. Also I have to correct that it is only the nAck that doesn't give the correct read from the port. Busy seems to work ok.
01-04-2006 05:40 AM
01-04-2006 09:41 AM
01-04-2006 11:02 AM - edited 01-04-2006 11:02 AM
Win XP does have some restrictions on the parallel port as compared with Win-2000. Win-XP added a security feature which does not allow to change the parallel port IO addressing. However, I doubt that it would affect nAck.
Ray
Message Edited by JoeLabView on 01-04-2006 12:05 PM