PC-TIO-10 base address error

[Jejo Koola]

I've verified several times that the jumpers are set correctly on the board
for 0x1A0 (the default base address setting for this board). Also, I've
checked in Measurement & Automation and it is set to use 0x1A0 to 0x1A7.
There are no conflicts. However, I am still receiving a 'The device is
not responding to selected base error message.' (I've also tried other addresses
within 0x100 and 0x3FF) Someone have this sort of problem?

[Harry King]

In article <38be8e53@newsgroups.ni.com>,
Jejo Koola wrote:
>
>I've verified several times that the jumpers are set correctly on the board
>for 0x1A0 (the default base address setting for this board). Also, I've
>checked in Measurement & Automation and it is set to use 0x1A0 to 0x1A7.
> There are no conflicts. However, I am still receiving a 'The device is
>not responding to selected base error message.' (I've also tried other
>addresses
>within 0x100 and 0x3FF) Someone have this sort of problem?

Yeah, I had it with a bunch of stuff.

My boards were really old, and they weren't very stable. What I ended up
doing was uninstalling and reinstalling a few times, and it eventually
accepted them. One weird thing that happened was that every ti
me I would
boot up, measurements and automation would add another identical device
(so instead of having 2 devices, I'd be told I had 4, 2 of which were
configured, and 2 were not).

Sorry I'm not of much help. But, try uninstalling and reinstalling them
and see what you get. You might also try to use a few different
addresses. I had the problem again when I upgraded my computer, and it
would not take the old addresses at all. Luckily, this time the default
addresses were not already assigned.

Harry


--

[aDent]

Same problem, no solutions

[Thanh Tieu]

I am witnessing a similar problem, after upgrading to MAX 2.0.3.17. It was working satisfactory with previous version MAX (NI-DAQ 6.7).