09-19-2005 09:44 AM
09-19-2005 01:56 PM
09-21-2005 08:37 AM
@xseadog wrote:
In your upgrade have you mass compiled your libraries?
chow
xseadog
09-22-2005 10:45 AM
I think xseadog is talking about the "mass compile" option in LabVIEW. When you upgrade, you must mass compile before using LabVIEW. The good news is it's super easy to do. The bad news is it'll probably take your computer about 3 hours to do it.
To mass compile, open LabVIEW and go to tools>>advanced>>mass compile. A file dialogue box will then appear asking you which directory you'd like to compile. Select the LabVIEW 7.1 directory. DO NOT select the National Instruments directory. If you do you'll be waiting for 3 or more days. The "Select Current directory" button means the directory you're currently viewing, not the directory you've highlighted in the file dialogue box.
Post and let us know if this helped.
Chris C
Applications Engineering
National Instruments
09-26-2005 02:01 PM
@Chris_C. wrote:
I think xseadog is talking about the "mass compile" option in LabVIEW. When you upgrade, you must mass compile before using LabVIEW. The good news is it's super easy to do. The bad news is it'll probably take your computer about 3 hours to do it.
To mass compile, open LabVIEW and go to tools>>advanced>>mass compile. A file dialogue box will then appear asking you which directory you'd like to compile. Select the LabVIEW 7.1 directory. DO NOT select the National Instruments directory. If you do you'll be waiting for 3 or more days. The "Select Current directory" button means the directory you're currently viewing, not the directory you've highlighted in the file dialogue box.
Post and let us know if this helped.
Chris C
Applications Engineering
National Instruments
I'll remember this for next time. What I did instead was delete all the older libraries that I could and made the program look exactly where i wanted it to for the llbs. I set the \LabView 7.1\vi.lib folder as the default folder to look in for them and emptied the \LabVIEW 6.1folder and \vi.lib folder. The mass compile probably would have been more elegant and finesse but it worked out for me. I'll do that on the next computer we upgrade. Thanks alot.
Gary D