mr_feta@hotmail.com (peter) writes:
> I know that this may sound a bit crazy (Labview is visual!
> Self-documenting!) but having just taken a Rational Rose UML course,
> I'm wondering how (if someone were crazy enough to try) to document a
> Labview architecture using UML.
>
> It would seem to me that a Labview VI is *similar* in principles to
> say, a class: uses relationships, separation of concerns, multiplicity
> etc.
>
> Does anyone know if this has been done before? If so, could anyone
> point me in the right direction? (searches for Labview + Rose or UML
> in google just come up with job opportunities.)
I'd just use the standard class notation, but perhaps create your own
<> for the different types of LabView components.
Ciao,
Peter K.
--
Peter J. Kootsookos Wb: www.clubi.ie/PeterK
"Here comes the future and you can't run from it,
If you've got a blacklist I want to be on it"
- 'Waiting for the great leap forwards', Billy Bragg
