08-12-2010 01:22 PM
Valerie,
Here is a quick image of how to start to use the method I described above. This would be expanded to the six shift registers you have.
Lynn
08-12-2010 01:27 PM
Ok I will work with it. Thanks for the help 🙂
08-12-2010 01:50 PM - edited 08-12-2010 01:52 PM
To the veterans out there...is this form more or less desirable from a memory standpoint than code with multiple cluster arrays shown above? Seems like X data are saved fewer times in this implementation, but perhaps there is an overhead associated with the build cluster of arrays and build array of clusters operations in each loop that offset these savings. (Oops, forget to increment the index).
08-12-2010 02:00 PM
@Houligan I can bet money on that the build cluster inside the loop makes a new array, thus a data copy. It must be better to work directly with the clustered arrays.
/Y