From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

GetTime Or Wait problem

Hi..

 

Time difference between two GetDate/Time calls with a wait function in between shows a lesser time taken than the wait duration specified. How is that possible? Pls see the attached VI. Any thoughts?

 

Thanks and regards

Chandra

 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(2,360 Views)

If you use "Highlight Execution", then you will see the behavior you have posted. Otherwise it has no problems.

 

[Edit:  Or am i missing something. Correct me if i am wrong.]

Message Edited by mathan on 12-06-2008 12:54 AM
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(2,350 Views)

The get-date time function has a resolution of 16 ms. (or something like that) on Windows ,  the returned timestamp isn't fully accurate. This is an OS limitation.

 

Ton (if you use the Tick count you will see a wait time of 50/51 ms)

Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
My LabVIEW Ideas

LabVIEW, programming like it should be!
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(2,331 Views)

Many thanks for the Tick Count tip.

 

After your reply, I found this link related to what you mentioned above:

http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/4E12F6841016929D86257126007A9D94?OpenDocument

 

This leads to one more question. Is there any other way we can get the current time with a resolution of 1 ms (in Windows XP)?

 

Thanks,

Chandra

 

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(2,319 Views)