LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Functional global set as reentrant vi in CLD sample?

Hi Everybody,

 

Thank you for all those clarifications.

I think the first aim of the post was to show that there were a "bug" in the CLD Training solutions.

 

I think people use those solutions to evaluate their own trainings (at least I did), and to find new (or better) implementations and tricks that they usually use.

Even if those solutions are taken from customer's examination solutions, I think Grading team should have a better look at it, and probably a little of rework before.

 

I had the exam two weeks ago, and I'm waiting for the results... And I'm really not confident about the outcomeSmiley Indifferent

 

Cheers,

Olivier L. | Certified LabVIEW Developer


Message 31 of 35
(1,248 Views)
Front panel is missing
Need to list all indicator properties! (ever think how much implicit code LV has?)
Is font Win 7 compatible?
Message 32 of 35
(1,198 Views)

Hello All,

 

Thanks for all the feedback on the sample ATM exam.

 

The sample ATM exam is a copy of a candidate's CLD submission and by no means this is the perfect solution - but it is a passing solution. In the candidate's evalaution, points were taken off for the making the VI re-entrant in addition to other minor issues.

I understand some people's passion in passing the failing verdict on the exam. But, we have to acknowledge, that there could be small but correctable shortcomings in the candidate's understanding. The exam's evaluation provided the feedback opportunity and the corrective learning experience.

As much as I would like to leave the sample solution as is, I also see the downside and (possible) associated risks. I will fix the solution and re-post today.

If you have any specific questions or comments. please email me at certification@ni.com

 

Thanks

 

Zaki Chasmawala

Senior Engineer

National Instruments - Training & Certification

Message 33 of 35
(1,120 Views)

@zakic wrote:

Hello All,

 

Thanks for all the feedback on the sample ATM exam.

 

The sample ATM exam is a copy of a candidate's CLD submission and by no means this is the perfect solution - but it is a passing solution. In the candidate's evalaution, points were taken off for the making the VI re-entrant in addition to other minor issues.

I understand some people's passion in passing the failing verdict on the exam. But, we have to acknowledge, that there could be small but correctable shortcomings in the candidate's understanding. The exam's evaluation provided the feedback opportunity and the corrective learning experience.

As much as I would like to leave the sample solution as is, I also see the downside and (possible) associated risks. I will fix the solution and re-post today.

If you have any specific questions or comments. please email me at certification@ni.com

 

Thanks

 

Zaki Chasmawala

Senior Engineer

National Instruments - Training & Certification


 

Thanks Zaki!

 

It's me again. Thanks for your active public support of the Certification program. You will add an asterisk and a link to this thread or a summary of such to help avoid an issue that drives me nuts that being "well I just coded it like the VI I downloaded from NI." I just want it to be clear that seeting it as reentrant was not correct and the only reason it worked was... fill in the blank.

 

again, Thank you!

 

Ben

 

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
Message 34 of 35
(1,114 Views)

@zakic wrote:

Hello All,

 

Thanks for all the feedback on the sample ATM exam.

 

The sample ATM exam is a copy of a candidate's CLD submission and by no means this is the perfect solution - but it is a passing solution. In the candidate's evalaution, points were taken off for the making the VI re-entrant in addition to other minor issues.

I understand some people's passion in passing the failing verdict on the exam. But, we have to acknowledge, that there could be small but correctable shortcomings in the candidate's understanding. The exam's evaluation provided the feedback opportunity and the corrective learning experience.

As much as I would like to leave the sample solution as is, I also see the downside and (possible) associated risks. I will fix the solution and re-post today.

If you have any specific questions or comments. please email me at certification@ni.com

 

Thanks

 

Zaki Chasmawala

Senior Engineer

National Instruments - Training & Certification


Zaki - Brilliant IDEA-

Post the evaluation comments (sanitized of course) or a summary with comments.  This would be a Serious Improvent and help CLD candidates learn more about what to expect.!


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 35 of 35
(1,093 Views)