10-27-2009 07:29 AM
Hi, everyone!
I meet a strange problem. Look at the block. If I choose 'no change' instead of 'minimized', then in the 'Array', between the elements from ten to nineteen(index) will be zero. But 'minimized' will solve the problem.Another way to solve it is not good but effective: not to close the reference.
10-27-2009 09:19 AM
10-27-2009 07:48 PM
The three files are produced by the same procedure and the different results seem to depend on the parameters wired to the 'New Report.vi' as I have mentioned before. Now I just find the different results depend on the different running time. So strange! Is there
anything wrong with the threads?
10-27-2009 10:47 PM - edited 10-27-2009 10:49 PM
It's hard to say what is going on. Are you sure all of your .xls files are valid files?
When I open your VI, you have 3 filenames that are full of garbage characters. Maybe the filenames are breaking the way the Excel file is being opened.
But if you know what you need to do so that it works okay for you (minimized vs. no change), then just use that.
10-28-2009 12:11 AM
10-28-2009 08:00 PM
Sometimes even in the occasion with the parameter 'minimized' or 'normal' or 'maximized', something wrong will happen unexpectedly because the disability of reading the right data. Can anyone help? It's my first time to meet such volatile problems.