LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Changing the Property Node label does not update the Terminal/Control label?

@Darin. K: I like the idea of a fused terminal/reference node. You should post that in the Idea Exchange.

 

@the others: Ouch! That hurts... Are you saying that this why I can't seem to keep any friend? 😉 (*)

 

(*) reference to "What about Bob?"'s scene in the pyschatrist office.

Message 11 of 33
(3,606 Views)

@X. wrote:

@Darin. K: I like the idea of a fused terminal/reference node. You should post that in the Idea Exchange.

 

@The others: Ouch! That hurts... Are you saying that this why I can't seem to keep any friend? 😉 (*)

 

(*) reference to "What about Bob?"'s scene in the pyschatrist office.


 

I was trying to pay you a compliment since the first thing required to recognize when something is wrong is to know what is right.

 

Ben

 

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
Message 12 of 33
(3,600 Views)

There is still fun to be had using the explicit PN and control reference:  Wire a Numeric control reference to a PN and choose 'Value'.  Disconnect and wire a string control reference to the PN.  Darn, no property is selected.  Delete the reference wire, now the Value property is selected and has the correct type, so go ahead and rewire the string reference.

0 Kudos
Message 13 of 33
(3,596 Views)

@Ben: 😉 is not :-). Sorry, I am no modern emoticon adept as some are on this forum (I won't name names :-).

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 33
(3,593 Views)

@Darin.K wrote:

There is still fun to be had using the explicit PN and control reference:  Wire a Numeric control reference to a PN and choose 'Value'.  Disconnect and wire a string control reference to the PN.  Darn, no property is selected.  Delete the reference wire, now the Value property is selected and has the correct type, so go ahead and rewire the string reference.



You're right.  Same behavior as the implicitly linked property nodes.

 

Somehow the Value propety of the string is not considered the same class as the value property of a numeric or boolean.  (I haven't tried experimenting beyond these 3 datatypes.)

 

EDIT:  Okay I just tried an array of numerics vs. an array of strings.  No break there.

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 33
(3,590 Views)

@Ravens Fan wrote:

@Darin.K wrote:

There is still fun to be had using the explicit PN and control reference:  Wire a Numeric control reference to a PN and choose 'Value'.  Disconnect and wire a string control reference to the PN.  Darn, no property is selected.  Delete the reference wire, now the Value property is selected and has the correct type, so go ahead and rewire the string reference.



You're right.  Same behavior as the implicitly linked property nodes.


Except you can actually make it switch in the explicit case.  In the implicit case you can only go back to the original control to make the value property reappear.  The explicit one changes upon disconnect of the reference wire.

0 Kudos
Message 16 of 33
(3,591 Views)

@Darin. K: can't seem to reproduce your symptoms (in LV 2011). I started with a Numeric reference to be able to access the Value property and then followed your explanations.

Here is what I get after connecting the String reference:

 

ScreenHunter_002.jpg

 

As Ravens Fan says, it mirrors the behavior I described above.

Now, and this becomes interesting (and seemingly different from what you are describing), if I delete the reference wire. here is what I get:

 

ScreenHunter_003.jpg

 

The Numeric Control is connected to a (apparently) String type value node and the wire is not broken!!! Gold...

(c) X 2012.

Message 17 of 33
(3,586 Views)

That is pretty sweet!  Try again without connecting anything to the value terminal, just wire the reference terminal.

0 Kudos
Message 18 of 33
(3,584 Views)

You mean like this:

 

ScreenHunter_005.jpg

 

(c) X 2012

0 Kudos
Message 19 of 33
(3,579 Views)

ValueReference.png

 

LV10

0 Kudos
Message 20 of 33
(3,574 Views)