ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.

Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.

Multifunction DAQ

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

USB6008 output

Solved!
Go to solution

Hi,

 

I have been asked to plot the voltage output of the USB-6008 vs the input of the NI-9234. The cards are linked together, so the NI-9234 should read exactly what the USB-6008 sends it to.

 

But there is a strange phenomenom that happens, the NI-9234 is unable to read the signal under 3.5mV. I do not know where this is coming from, do you have any ideas?

 

Could this be from the USB-6008, or the NI-9234?

 

On my graph, the white line is the signal that i am sending to the usb-6008 (ideal signal) and the red is the input of the NI-9234.

 

Thank you

partie3-capture_valide1.jpg 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(3,722 Views)

Take a deep look into the spec of the 6008, without doing so , I assume the output offset of this cheap device is in full spec 😉

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(3,708 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author Dibbs

Hi Dibbs,

 

We are looking at a couple things here - the AO accuracy of the 6008, the AI accuracy of the 9234, and the  use case of the 9234.  The 9234 is a DSA device so is it is optimized for acceleration and vibration measurements - not low frequency/DC measurements.  The offset error of the 9234 is 7.1 mV and the absolute accuracy of the 6008 AO is 7 mV, up to 34 mV at full scale. One thing you could try doing is using the AI of the 6008 to characterize the 6008 AO or use a device optimized for DC measurements, like a DMM.

 

6008 AO Specs

 

9234 Accuracy Specs

Regards,
Jim Schwartz
Message 3 of 3
(3,699 Views)