03-13-2008 05:50 PM
03-14-2008 11:36 AM
03-17-2008 02:59 PM
Thank you for your response, John. I tried 'Differential Terminal' mode without modification of wiring. I read the information on the website, I think that I can understand why this mode would work better. However, the measurement I read from the Labview is around 10v, which can not be right, since the output range of pressure transducer is between 1-5vdc, unless I misunderstand something here. Could you please help me out here.
I would like to explain the wiring setup around the NI USB-6210.
The pressure transducer has three wires, white goes to Ai1 of DAQ for signal connection, red goes to positive of power supply, black goes to both AiGND of DAQ as ground and ground of power supply. The power supply of pressure transducer is just a simple transformer with a range of vdc supply bought from the shop and we are using 12vdc range. We set up wiring by ourselves. The cables are all less than a metre, not shielded.
I couldn't find a dock station for my laptop, but am going to try a desktop today to see whether that would make a difference.
Thank you very much and look forward to your reply.
03-18-2008 11:52 AM
03-19-2008 11:38 PM
Hi John
Thank you very much for your reply. Here is what we had done.
We changed to 'differential' mode.
We changed the wiring so that Output of Pressure Transducer is connected to Ai0 and Gound is connected to Ai9. Red wire and black ground wire are connected to power supply. Then we realized that there were lots of noise coming from THAT power supply who works like a bridge sending the noise from power line and laptop to the DAQ.
To eliminate the noise, we switched to a battery power supply (it is just 2# 9v batteries in series). This works really well. There are still spikes, but most of them are eliminated after filtering and time averaging. Here are the steps we used:
1 Acquire Analog Voltage - a simple calibration is done in this step to make sure the final reading at zero force is at minimum, here is the table
|
Calibrated |
Uncalibrated |
|
1 |
1.0604 |
|
4 |
4.0604 |
2 Filter - Lowpass Cutoff at 1hz. I tried 100m, which doesn't make any differences.
3 Amplitude - to get DC reading
4 Time averaging - to get rid of the spikes
5 Formula - to convert the voltage reading to force
You may remember the problem I had, the reading at zero force keeps changing daily. This still occurs. The initial reading changed from 1.061v (morning) to 1.059v (afternoon).
I still can't find the reason for it. The machine has a original dia gauge which is reading the pressure and converts it to force, therefore any pressure friction loss within the hydaulic system should be compromised. The pressure transducer has a maximum error of 0.1%, therefore the 1.061-1.059=0.002>0.001.
I'm wondering whether you could help us with this, also have any comments on the setup steps we used. Thank you and look forward to hearing from you.
Xiao-ting
03-21-2008 08:36 AM
03-24-2008 08:23 PM
Hi John
Thank you so much for your reply. We are using Ai1 and Ai9, not Ai0 and Ai9, sorry about the typing mistake.
We set the input range to 1v-5v.
2mv fluctuation corresponds to pressure of about 2.5psi.
The oil tank is not sealed, and we don't think the ambient pressure's change would cause a difference in reading. I will check the temperature's influcence later and let you know the results.
I checked the voltage output of the pressure transducer with a DMM and it is the same as the labview reading from the Amplitude and Time Averaging step. Though I can only read minimum 1mv from the DMM. I checked the voltage reading again today and Table shows the comparison with what we got last week. The pressure transducer is still runing on the batteries (2# 9v), and I just check the output voltage is 17.8v.
| Initial | Ram Floating | |
| 20 Mar am | 1.011 | 1.061 / 1.062 |
| 20 Mar pm | 1.008 | 1.059 |
| 25-Mar | 1.002 | 1.053 |
Could you please let me know what you think about this? We are really desperate here. We cannot get the whole thing calibrated to ISO qualification if the zero-force reading has such a offset, which leads to a untolerable readings of forces.
Thank you so much for your help and look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards,
Xiao-ting
03-25-2008 11:13 PM
03-26-2008 09:00 AM
03-26-2008 11:53 PM
Hi John
Thank you so much for your reply. I tried your suggestions and please take a look at the results and look forward to your comments
1 Bias Resistor
I tried bias resistors (2# 1W 47k RR) and wired them just like what is shown in Figure 11. And it still shows lots of noise in raw voltage reading, fluctuation (spikes) is about 0.01v. If using the Filtering and Time Averaging, the fluctuation reduced to about 0.001v. This is when the tensile tester is off, the average voltage reading is about 1.02v-1.026v.
The reading went up from 1.002v to 1.02v after added resistors.
2 Unfortunately I don't have another pressure transducer to try on.
3 Battery power supply
I did run a trial to find out the battery supply voltage's influence, here is the readings (tensile machine is off) which were taken within 15mins:
| Battery Power Voltage | Labview reading voltage |
| 17.73 | 1.026 |
| 17.62 | 1.025 |
| 17.57 | 1.0245 |
Then I used a benchtop power supply and changed it from 12v to 23v very suddenly, the readings are 1.023v and 1.026v, which indicates the influence of 1v power supply = 0.0003v reading, which is small compared to the data in the above table.
I think I do need to find a more stable power supply, but the main error comes from somewhere else.
4 Desktop
We have been using a desktop PC since yesterday. I didn't notice any changes. Significant changes occurs when 1) change to differential mode; 2) battery power supply 3) Labview filtering and time averaging.
5 Other information
Bad news is that we just realized the labview we got is only a limited edition and the company may not be able to pay for the full license, which mean I won't be able to use Filter and Time Averaging of Labview when the time is up. Therefore, I really need to find a way to get rid of both noise and offset of average reading.
I did notice a reading change about 0.002v when I was using the multimeter, which shows how sensitive this is. I feel like that I'm losing confidence in this whole setup, but don't want to give up. I'm sure there is something I can do to find out what is wrong. Thank you for your help and look forward to your reply.
Kind regards,
Xiao-ting