ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.
Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.
10-21-2011 04:44 PM
I am using an Exergen IRt/c.3AMF-HiE sensor to monitor a liquid
http://www.exergen.com/industrial/PDFs/adjustable3amf.pdf
The sensor will be used outside its normal operating range (liquid temp = 37C), so its output sensitivity will be roughly 1/3 that of a normal type-J thermocouple (0.019mV/degC instead of 0.055 mV/degC). It will need CJC, so I would like to use an NI-9213 for signal conditioning. I need to detect temp changes of 0.2C. If I use the high-resolution mode on the 9213, I should be able to detect 0.2C changes (sensitivity spec = 0.02 x3 = 0.06 for IR sensor). Is this correct?
10-24-2011 05:19 PM
AC DeWitt,
In theory, you could use the NI-9213 measure any voltage within the input voltage limitations. Applying CJC and Thermocouple calibrations is where you may run into trouble. The CJC setup & calibration is based upon thermocouple inputs, so you would essentially need the IR sensor to 'mimic' a thermocouple upon input. Assuming you could calibrate the IR sensor against thermocouple perfomance, theoretically you should be fine.
It's a hands on world, plug it in and test it out. Make sure to stay inside the voltage limitations of the device.
Regards,
Alexander M
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
10-24-2011 05:58 PM
I'm not very familiar with those sensors, but from what I gather, the output can be treated as a thermocouple. In that case, from the 9213 manual (on the product page under the resources tab):
Measurement sensitivity
High-resolution mode
Types J, K, T, E, N ...............<0.02 °C
Types B, R, S ....................... <0.15 °C
We also have a higher accuracy model, the 9214, which from the manual has these sensitivity specs:
Measurement sensitivity
High-resolution mode
Types J, K, T, E, N ...............0.01 °C
Types R, S ............................ 0.03 °C
Type B.................................. 0.04 °
10-25-2011 07:56 AM
Thanks for the advice. I'm going to give it a shot, per your suggestion - I just wanted to make sure there weren't any showstoppers. I will be doing independent cal, so I should be able to work around the issues you mention. Thanks!