10-31-2005 03:25 PM
11-01-2005
08:32 AM
- last edited on
05-23-2025
06:53 PM
by
Content Cleaner
11-09-2005 03:49 PM
11-09-2005 04:14 PM
12-15-2005 01:52 PM
12-16-2005 08:24 AM
12-16-2005 09:29 AM
I must have tried this with 8 bits and assumed that it would work with the advertised 24 bits for the 6251. I suppose I need to stop trusting sales documents and start digging deeper into the engineering specifications.
I was planning to use this vi with a 6259 in an upcoming application. Now that I look I see where it actually defines the DIO lines and PFI lines in the specifications. It definitely looks like the 6259 is a far greater value for mixed signal work than just the 6251 when you look at the costs and the extra DIO. I believe this vi should work with the 6259 properly, at least for the actual 32 bits of DIO, excluding the glorified PFI's.
12-16-2005
09:41 AM
- last edited on
05-23-2025
06:53 PM
by
Content Cleaner
I understand what you are saying, but the product page tries to make this evident. Notice, one of the bullets is "Correlated DIO (8 clocked lines, 10MHz)..."
Again, I understand your confusion, just wanted to point that out.
-Alan A.
12-16-2005 09:56 AM
I see what you are talking about. It's just that "Correlated DIO" is an NI phrase only. Outside of NI web pages I've never heard of the term, nor can I find it regarding anything other than NI's DAQ series in a web search. I initially assumed all DIO would be able to run off some kind of a definable clock. If a DIO line is not correlated, does that mean it is static only in that I can only read either a 1 or 0 by making a single DIO Read, but I cannot read at any defined rate?
Now I understand that NI has two kinds of DIO, regular and correlated with correlated being a subset of regular. They probably could have come up with terminology that would have been a little more clear, maybe "static" and "dynamic" or something along those lines. "Correlated" isn't very intuitive in my opinion.
12-16-2005 10:11 AM