Motion Control and Motor Drives

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

"Distributed motion control'

Hi there,

 

For a future project we are making a first study, and as I'm not really familiar with NI solutions, I hope some of you can share some thoughts.

 

For this project, we will have to control the following hardware:

 - 28 cryogenic stepper motors in open loop (no encoder feedback possible) and very simple motions ("move x degrees") just a few times per hour max.

 - 2 cryogenic stepper motors in open loop, but with a constantly changing position setpoint (>50Hz should be fine)

 - 50-100 I/O temperature and pressure readings (sampling in de range of a few Hz maximum)

 

How would a possible "NI solution" look?

Our systems engineering guidelines say that it is highly preferrably to move the "control unit" away from the instrument (say 50 meters apart, in a computer room), and that all fieldbuses should be ethernet based. In that case I was thinking to have:

 - a PXI chassis in the computer room

 - an EtherCAT connection from the PXI chassis to a daisy chain of 4 NI-9144 expansion chassis, all equipped with the 28+2 NI 9512 stepper controllers, connected to 28+2 stepper drivers

 - an extra NI-9144 (or compactFieldpoint chassis) for the DAQ

 

 

It seems quite rediculous to have so many NI-9144 expansion chassis, so another solution is to ignore the "control unit near instrument" rule and to have a single PXI controller with 4 8-axis stepper controller boards and a few DAQ boards inside.

 

Another solution would be to have 28+2 standalone third-party stepper "controller and drivers" inside the instrument, connected with an ethernet fieldbus to a labview target in the computer room. But I'm having troubles of finding suitable stepper controllers+drivers (maybe because stepper motors and ethernet motion control are not so commonly found in industry?)

 

 

Thanks for any thoughts on this,

 

Wim

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(3,987 Views)

I'm very curious how you solved this.  Can you provide any details?

 

Thanks!

Steve

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(3,183 Views)

We've roughly worked out a layout of such a control system on paper, but it remains a quite vague "study" until the project enters the next stage (which depends on funding since it's a scientific instrument). I can send you a document about it if you want (just PM me your e-mail address), but I doubt it'll be of much use. Anyway the final solution will look much different from our original plan, and if I'd have any say in it, I'd most likely choose a PLC-based solution over this one.

 

Wim

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(3,180 Views)