06-26-2008 12:41 PM
Stop it.
What I am trying to encourage you to do is to actually write some code yourself and not always ask for the solution. This forum does not exist to do all of the work for someone. You've already been given a perfectly viable solution to your question and you can take it or leave it. All of the various options for displaying data in a chart or multiple charts are shown in the shipping examples and in the tutorials you've been pointed to.
06-26-2008 01:15 PM
06-27-2008 07:42 AM
Do you have to see all graphs at the same time?
Maybe we could consider some other approaches to the solution.
RayR
06-27-2008 08:11 AM - edited 06-27-2008 08:13 AM
06-27-2008 12:18 PM
So you would have a radio button to select which channels you want. And from that you could index which waveforms to send to the graph.
Since you know which waveforms are going to the graph, you could also find out the sizes of each array (waveform) and determine the largest size. That could be used to set your x-axis.
Then you combine the active waveform before sending them to a Waveform Graph.
How does that sound?
RayR
06-27-2008 02:04 PM
06-27-2008 03:04 PM
06-30-2008 07:49 AM
06-30-2008 07:53 AM
It depends on the behavior that you want. You can clear a graph by wiring a contant (array of doubles).
Have you decided how you want to proceed? We suggested many things... 😉
RayR
06-30-2008 09:24 AM
you would have a radio button to select which channels you want. And from that you could index which waveforms to send to the graph.
Since you know which waveforms are going to the graph, you could also find out the sizes of each array (waveform) and determine the largest size. That could be used to set your x-axis.
Then you combine the active waveform before sending them to a Waveform Graph.
This sounds good so we go from here !!! so this VI is a good start ?