ni.com is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance.

Some services may be unavailable at this time. Please contact us for help or try again later.

LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

labview does not update OPC variable value

Hello,
 
I am using labview 8.2.1 together with RSLinx, to communicate with an Allen Bradley PLC.
I am experiencing the following behaviour.
I am reading/writing OPC variables using the data socket configuration (front panel -> right mouse button, and so on)
 
most of the time, everything works. I just write the value of the controls and these values are updated. (see file OPC_1.vi)
Sometimes however, the value is not updated in the server: all clients connected to the server does not realize the value has changed. as I am writing the value in a loop, the control is updated every single iteration. nevertheless, the OPC variable is not updated=> it seems labview does not generate an event to the OPC server, as the control has the same value as in previous iteration.
 
to fix the problem, I have done the following (see OPC_2.vi). I have a second control reading the same OPC variable (configured as read only). if at the beginning of a loop, the two controls have different values (that means, that the write-control has a value, which has not been transmited to OPC server => the read-control still has a not-updated-value), then the write-control is refreshed to the old value, and again to the new value (so that labview registerr a value change and notifies the opc server).
this works. but somehow i have the feeling, i am doing the job which labview should to, taking care of if labview succeeded notifying the OPC server.
 
I have tested this too: if instead of writing the value of the control, I use a property node to change its value (see OPC_3.vi), then it works too. but the loop takes much longer (it seems Labview creates an event each and every iteration, even if I write always the same value). In this case I can see too that the process RSLINX takes a lot of CPU time, probably because of so many updates...
 
can it be done in any other way?
 
thank you in advance
 
 
Download All
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 1
(2,626 Views)