09-19-2005 10:34 PM
09-20-2005 08:08 AM
09-20-2005 11:14 AM
10-27-2008 11:20 AM - edited 10-27-2008 11:22 AM
Along the same line, I noticed the same comment in the help file:
"This VI remembers the time stamp of the previous waveform generated and continues to increment the time stamp from that point"
Seems to me that the VI should be keeping track of the Number of Samples and the Sample's Per Second based on the last time the VI was run (whether in a loop or not) So why is it that this VI seems to rely on the sampling rate of the loop itself? If I increase the Millisecond Wait Time my generated signal slows and when I decrease my millisecond wait time my generated signal updates much faster.
Run the attached VI (LV 8.2.1)